http://www.scienceprog.com/why-to-move-from-asm-to-c/ ScienceProg serves scientific, embedded, biomedical engineering, physics based contents. If you want your article or scientific project to be on this site, do not hesitate to contact and send to scienceprog@gmail.com. Mon, 12 May 2008 01:59:18 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 http://www.scienceprog.com/why-to-move-from-asm-to-c/#comment-898 Eugene Hutorny Sat, 02 Sep 2006 13:13:11 +0000 http://www.scienceprog.com/why-to-move-from-asm-to-c/#comment-898 I am in process of researching around assemblers about to start designing <a href="http://hutorny.in.ua/research/new-programming-language-embedded-applications" title="" rel="nofollow">a new language</a>. In my opinion, major disadvantage of high-level languages (HLL) is obscure code generation. Since HLL are not targeted for (not constrained with) any particular platform, code generation is left up to compiler vendor (developer). It is OK in case when hardware constraints on the target platform are pretty much loose and system (product) built with it does not violate the requirements. However, when tough hardware constraints come across tight system requirements, engineers need more control on the produced code. <a href="http://hutorny.in.ua/research/assemblers-vs-hll" title="" rel="nofollow">Assemblers vs HLL</a> I am in process of researching around assemblers about to start designing a new language.
In my opinion, major disadvantage of high-level languages (HLL) is obscure code generation.
Since HLL are not targeted for (not constrained with) any particular platform, code generation is left up to compiler vendor (developer). It is OK in case when hardware constraints on the target platform are pretty much loose and system (product) built with it does not violate the requirements. However, when tough hardware constraints come across tight system requirements, engineers need more control on the produced code.
Assemblers vs HLL

]]>