<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Control motor PWM schematic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scienceprog.com/control-motor-pwm-schematic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scienceprog.com/control-motor-pwm-schematic/</link>
	<description>ScienceProg serves scientific, embedded, biomedical engineering, physics based contents. If you want your article or scientific project to be on this site, do not hesitate to contact and send to scienceprog@gmail.com.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 02:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Arpita A Potdar</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceprog.com/control-motor-pwm-schematic/#comment-18089</link>
		<dc:creator>Arpita A Potdar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 16:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceprog.com/control-motor-pwm-schematic/#comment-18089</guid>
		<description>hello sir,
 I am a TY Btech Elex student. i need a C code for PWM control of DC motor controller using ATmega16 and IC L293D IC. Can u pls help me out?
Awaiting your reply</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello sir,<br />
 I am a TY Btech Elex student. i need a C code for PWM control of DC motor controller using ATmega16 and IC L293D IC. Can u pls help me out?<br />
Awaiting your reply</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scienceprog</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceprog.com/control-motor-pwm-schematic/#comment-13647</link>
		<dc:creator>scienceprog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 15:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceprog.com/control-motor-pwm-schematic/#comment-13647</guid>
		<description>There is NPN transistor which depends on motor power. For instance you can use 2N3055.
It is better to use n-channel MOSFET transistor for instance IRFD024 or IRFZ46N which is more effective than general purpose transistor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is NPN transistor which depends on motor power. For instance you can use 2N3055.<br />
It is better to use n-channel MOSFET transistor for instance IRFD024 or IRFZ46N which is more effective than general purpose transistor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabor</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceprog.com/control-motor-pwm-schematic/#comment-13645</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 14:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceprog.com/control-motor-pwm-schematic/#comment-13645</guid>
		<description>what is the type of transistor?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what is the type of transistor?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jed</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceprog.com/control-motor-pwm-schematic/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>Jed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 16:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceprog.com/control-motor-pwm-schematic/#comment-143</guid>
		<description>Thanks sienceprog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks sienceprog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scienceprog</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceprog.com/control-motor-pwm-schematic/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>scienceprog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 05:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceprog.com/control-motor-pwm-schematic/#comment-141</guid>
		<description>I guess that by using two 555 timers you have better control of generation of PMW, because one IC is dedicated to generated the frequency and another is to select duty cycle. The main feature of using two 555 timers is that you can have much wider range of frequencies while using one 555 timer  gives you limited option to adjust frequency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess that by using two 555 timers you have better control of generation of PMW, because one IC is dedicated to generated the frequency and another is to select duty cycle. The main feature of using two 555 timers is that you can have much wider range of frequencies while using one 555 timer  gives you limited option to adjust frequency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


